Author and year Study Follow-up months (average) Method Number of knees operated Average age (years) Women % BMI (kg/m[@317926])
Blakeney 2019[@317941] Case control study 33,5 Kinematic 18 61 ± 8 67 31 ± 6
Mechanical 18 64 ± 7 67 32 ± 3
An 2019[@317942] Retrospective cohort study 0 Kinematic 90 67 ± 12 61 No comparison
Mechanical 120 67,9 ± 10,7 63
Jeremić 2020[@317970] Case control study 12 Kinematic 24 70,7 ± 6,7 No differences 30,6 ± 4,5
Mechanical 24 72.5 (5.8) 30.0 (4)
Luceri 2020[@317971] Retrospective cohort study 3 Kinematic 13 70 ± 7,1 54 28,5 ± 4,8
Mechanical 13 69,1 ± 8 69 27,4 ± 3,4
Shelton 2021*[@317972] Retrospective cohort study 36 ± 16 Kinematic 78 70 ± 8 73 31 ± 6
120 ± 54 Mechanical 78 NA 73 NA
Abhari 2021[@317973] Retrospective cohort study 12 Kinematic
(1-5º varus)		 43 66 ± 1,5 58 34 ± 1
Kinematic
(6-10º varus)		 56 68 ± 1,2 36 31 ± 0,71
Kinematic
(11-14º varus)		 16 67 ± 2,7 44 34 ± 1,7
Mechanical 115 No differences BMI higher than in KA
Alexander 2022[@317974] Retrospective cohort study 1,5 Kinematic 107 65 ± 8,6 57 34,2 ± 8
Mechanical 223 64,5 ± 8,5 59 32,5 ± 6,6
Elbuluk 2022[@317975] Retrospective cohort study 24 Kinematic (cutting guide) 100 No differences in age, sex, BMI or coronal plane deviation.
Mechanical (navigated) 100
Sappey-Marinier 2022[@317955] Case series 32 ± 26 Mechanical 7 70,1 ± 9,3 57 27 ± 3
Kinematic 7
Winnock de Grave 2022[@317933] Retrospective cohort study 12 Inverted kinematic 40 69,9 ± 8,3 60 29,2 ± 4,8
Mechanical (adjusted) 40 67,4 ± 9,5 58 30 ± 5,3
Choi 2022[@317976] Retrospective cohort study 24 Functional (robotic) 60 70 ± 5,7 78 26,7 ± 2,6
Mechanical (manual) 60 70,1 ± 5,7 78 27,1 ± 3,5
Lung 2022[@317977] Retrospective cohort study 3 Kinematic 44 68,5 ± 7,5 63 31 ± 6,6
Mechanical 57 68,2 ± 7,7 65 32,6 ± 5,6
Ma 2022[@317978] Ambispective cohort study 6 Restrictive kinematic 48 69,3 86 27,2
Mechanical 45 67,4 78 25,2
Wen 2023[@317979] Retrospective cohort study 30,8 Kinematic 65 70,6 ± 6,4 70 27,3 ± 3,4
Mechanical 61 71,2 ± 7,1 66 27,2 ± 3,7