year study no classification age (y) cause of injury sex (m:f) hand (d:nd) follow-up (mo) Type of functional evaluation
1979 Pierce at al. 18 n/m 36,7 13mva, 1fall, 7unknown 13m, 8f n/m 63,6 (r, 8-120) objective & functional evaluation
1984 Rogers et al. 19 Rogers classification 31,0+/-10,87 10mva, 3industrila, 2fall,1gsw 16m, 3f n/m 21,84+/-7,37 ROM
1985 Lange et al. 9 n/m 27,33+/-10,45 7mva, 2industrial n/m n/m 22,33+/-19,03 Lange & Foster classification, ROM
1998 Sohn et al. 13 n/m 38,92+/-13,59 6mva, 4fall, 3industrial 7m, 6f n/m 18,08+/-6,44 ROM, Lange & Foster classification
1998 Yokoyama et al. 15 AO/OTA classification 32,87+/-14,41 7mva, 2fall, 6industrial 13m,2f n/m 45,67+/-31,73 ROM, Khalfayan score
2000 Capomassi et al. 10 Capomassi classification 27,4+/-15,85 6mva, 3industrial, 1fall 9m, 1f 7d, 7nd 33,5 (r, 13-58) Khalfayan score
2000 Lerner et al. 6 n/m 30,17+/-16,4 4blast, 2gsw 7m n/m n/m ROM, Khalfayan score, grip strength
2003 Solomon et al. 26 AO/ASIF classification 36,92+/-15,14 n/m 15m, 11f n/m 24,33+/-13/01 ROM, Khalfayan score, grip strength
2006 Anomou et al. 7 Gleizes classification 39,14 (r, 15-57) 3mva, 3indutrial 6m, 1f n/m 13,85 (r, 6-25) Lange & Foster classification
2007 Stoik et al. 7 AO/ASIF classification 52,86+/-30,60 5mva, 1blast, 1fall 2m, 5f n/m 12 (r, 2-22) ROM
2012 El Ibrahimi et al. 12 Agarwal and Chadha classification 31,5+/-15,49 9fall, 3mva 8m, 4f n/m n/m Lange & Foster classification
2013 Lamah et al. 8 n/m n/m 8mva 5m, 3f 3d, 5nd 10 (r, 6-18) MEPS
2013 Jockel et al. 19 Jockel classification 41,53+/-15,42 n/m 14m, 5f 10d, 9nd 80,46+/-38,45 ROM, ASES, VAS
2013 Ditsios et al. 19 Ditsios classification 33,68+/-9,05 15mva, 2industrial, 2fall 16m, 3f 17d, 2nd 26 (r, 1-40) ROM, MEPS, Khalfayan score, grip & elbow strength
2015 Cho et al. 6 n/m 45,17+/-14,19 5roller, 1mva 5m, 1f 2d, 4nd 37,00+/-32,96 MEPS, ASES, VAS
2016 Jimenez-Diaz et al. 23 AO/OTA & Ditsios classifiaction 35,87+/-13,18 16mva, 5fall, 1gsw, 1blast 19m, 4f 4d, 19nd 19,53+/-11,05 ROM, MEPS
2018 Trigui et al 14 Rogers classification 32,07+/-11,52 11mva, 2industrial, 1fall 11m, 3f n/m 21,79+/-14,33 Stewart & Hundley classification modified by Diémé
2018 Langshong et al. 10 n/m 37,80+/-14,93 6mva, 3fall, 1building collapse 7m, 3f 6d, 4nd 5,15+/-0,58 DASH score
2020 Marius et al. 4 n/m 31 4xmva 3m, 1f 3d, 1nd n/m MEPS
2019 Pari et al. 1 n/m 53 fall m n/m 24 ROM
2018 Badia et al. 1 n/m 30 mva m yes 48 ROM
2018 Lee et al. 1 n/m 21 fall f n/m 12 ROM
2017 Ayoubi et al. 1 n/m 24 fall m n/m 6 ROM, MEPS
2017 Kafadar et al. 1 n/m 52 industrial m n/m 6 ROM
2015 Bettuzzi et al. 1 n/m 42 fall m n/m 12 ROM, MEPS
2015 Goni et al. 1 n/m 44 mva f n/m 24 ROM
2015 Bisinella et al. 1 AO/OTA classification 22 mva m n/m 8 ROM
2011 Galasso et al. 1 Rogers & Simpson classification 28 mva m n/m 18 ROM, grip strength, LES
2006 De Carli et al. 1 Rogers & Simpson classification 25 mva f n/m 24 ROM
1997 Sarup et al. 1 n/m 35 fall f n/m 5 ROM
1995 Al-Zahrani et al. 1 n/m 45 mva f n/m 18 ROM
1989 Viegas et al. 1 n/m 59 industrial m n/m 2 ROM